Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorOpsal, Hilde
dc.contributor.authorTopphol, Arne Kåre
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-20T06:24:32Z
dc.date.available2023-10-20T06:24:32Z
dc.date.created2023-08-09T11:07:13Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationNordisk matematikkdidaktikk. 2023, 28 (1–2), 99-112. https://ncm.gu.se/2023/07/nomad-volume-28-no-1-2/en_US
dc.identifier.issn1104-2176
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3097690
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we investigated how 2,544 Norwegian students in the fifth, sixth, eighth and ninth grades of different schools answered a missing addend task that required a relational understanding of the equal sign. Only 50% of the students correctly solved the task (30% in grade 5 and 80% in grade 9). We then selected the students who managed to correctly solve two tasks that did not have an explicit equal sign but required an assessment of equality. The percentage of correct answers in the missing addend task increased to 71%, but even among those students who successfully handled the concept of equality, a substantial portion did not solve the equal sign task correctly. Our results indicate that equality and the equal sign cannot be treated as equivalent concepts.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleThe problematic equal signen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe problematic equal signen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber99-112en_US
dc.source.volume28en_US
dc.source.journalNordisk matematikkdidaktikken_US
dc.source.issue1–2en_US
dc.identifier.cristin2165838
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel