Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMeling, Ådne
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T15:10:52Z
dc.date.available2024-01-26T15:10:52Z
dc.date.created2024-01-25T10:09:01Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0002-9246
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3114140
dc.description.abstractThroughout the recent pandemic, governments used digital video technologies to facilitate social distancing during political meetings. In addition to enabling social distancing, a theoretical advantage of virtual political governance is that it has the potential to mitigate the hierarchical administrative relationship between capitals and regions and the differences in real estate prices and wealth that often follows from such hierarchical structures. However, hardly any governments are currently planning a long-term transition to work-from-home digital governance. On the contrary, several countries are doubling down on the centralization model of government by building new capitals in new locations. This article proposes that in a time of digital alternatives, physically centralized “capitals” could be considered examples of bad equilibrium.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleCapitals as bad equilibriaen_US
dc.title.alternativeCapitals as bad equilibriaen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.journalThe American journal of economics and sociologyen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12560
dc.identifier.cristin2234221
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel