Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEnger, Hans-Olav
dc.contributor.authorSpilling, Eivor Finset
dc.contributor.authorSameien, Marianne Brodahl
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-22T11:09:15Z
dc.date.available2023-06-22T11:09:15Z
dc.date.created2018-10-19T14:41:19Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationReorganising Grammatical Variation: Diachronic studies in the retention, redistribution and refunctionalisation of linguistic variants. 2018, 209-230en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9789027201645
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3072662
dc.description.abstractThis study examines two examples of grammatical variation in Norwegian inflection, strong versus weak verb conjugation and affixal versus periphrastic adjective comparison. The main claim is that the choice of variants is not as arbitrary as one may think, which rather indicates a division of labour. The strong verb inflection tends to be motivated not only by phonology, but also by semantics. The affixal and periphrastic adjective comparisons tend to be used with different sets of adjectives and for different semantic purposes. These observations support the Principle of Contrast, the idea that a difference in form normally relates to a difference in meaning.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofReorganising Grammatical Variation: Diachronic studies in the retention, redistribution and refunctionalisation of linguistic variants
dc.titleMaking sense of grammatical variation in Norwegianen_US
dc.title.alternativeMaking sense of grammatical variation in Norwegianen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.description.version
dc.source.pagenumber209-230en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.203.08sam
dc.identifier.cristin1621771
cristin.unitcode223,18,20,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for språk og litteratur
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel